Wee, covering, dangerous under-water beasties

A few years ago a submarine surfaced off the West coast of scotland in the midnight hours. A rubber boat landed an indeterminate number of Israeli agents on the shore. they were met by some person unknown, who drove them down the long, lonely, winding road to Glasgow. The car was stopped by a police patrol, the agenst were arrested and later deported to Israel as "illegal immigrants".
The whole incident was given about one column inch in the controlled media in Scotland. Surely such a story deserved a two or three page spread, with photos of the agensts & their chaffeur, perhaps even his car? Leader writers should have speculated over the reason why they came here, and waxed indignant over the Israelis blantent breach of British law.
Imagine if the situation had been reversed & a British submarine had landed a number of British agensts on the shore of Palestine, to be met by a Briton claiming Israeli citizenship. It would have been news all over the world. Jewish orchrastrated street demos would have been held outside British embassies in a dozen countries, all ailing about the "anti-semitism" & waving placards saying "Never Again".
The masters of Hollywood would have sprung into action with a blockbuster showing Mossad & Shin Beth heroes foiling a plot by the wicked Brits to inflict a "second" holocaust on the peace-loving jews of Israel. The Israeli govt. would have demanded a grovelling apology from the wimps of Westminster and, naturally monitery compensation.
But in reality, it was British, not Israeli soverignty which was breached, there was a deafening silence. What we must ask is this: who decided the story of the submarine & the agents should only be given one inch of coverage on the inside pages of the Scottish press? Was it the same people who squashed any exposure of how Eretz Israel sold Exoccet misslies to Argentina which were launched against British ships to kill our lads during the Falklands campaign?
The left-wing "New Staytesmen" recently published an article by Matthew Kalman & Johyn Murrey entitled "New Age Nazism". This made much of the allegation that a staunch patrioty of long-standing, Mary Stanton, had been questioned by MI5 over her name being listed as a contact for "International Anti-semites". One might think that MI5 would be more usefully employed finding out who has so much power in the media that they can bury a story about Exocets from Israel being used to kill British servicemen, and reduce the submarine scandal to a mere column inch.
And we must also ask why did the Israeli agenst come here? Obviously they were up to no good. You can't land a submarine in the wee sma' hours off the West Coast of Scotland if you intend visiting the Edinburgh Festival. And who was the diver who met them? Was he a jew, born & bred in Scotland, with an impreecable background, even speaking with a pronounced Scottish accent? Where did he live? Did he plan to take his illegal guests to some safe house in part of Glasgow (Hillhead or Newton Mearns maybe) until they had completed their mission? Where was that house? Did it have the paraphernalia of the spy: radio communications equipment, code books, arms, special poisons, explosives & detonaters, lists of potential targets for assassination?
Why were none of these questions asked in our Parlament down in Westminster? Where were the Scottish representitives at the time? Were they too bust bevvying up on the late night train which carries them from their secretaries in London to their wives in Glasgow of a weekend, to bother themselves about such mundane affairs as the defence of the Realm? Or is it perhaps recognised amongst MP's that it is deadly to one's future career prospects to criticise blatent jewish involvement in other nations?
I personally knew three staunch anti-zionists who met untimely ends in Scotland. 1) Said Hammami, the PLO representitive in London, who was active with the British Anti-Zionist Organisation - Palestine Solidarity Group. 2) Robert Coleman, an organiser of BAZO-PS. 3) George Mitchell also a BAZO-PS organiser.
Said Hammami was murdered down the the London Bureau of the PLO. In shis study "To the ends of the earth", well-known author David Yallop tells us the Mossad were responsible. A man named Robert Coleman was murdered in the Parkhead district of Glasgow's East End. The Robert Coleman of BAZO-PS lived in nearby Shettleston & I haven't seen or heard of him since. George Mitchell, who could swim like a seal (he had used Townhead Baths, a hundred yards from his home, regularly since he was a child) drowned off the West Coast. The police announced there was no foul play, but they said the same about Willie MacCrae, the Scottish lawyer with zionist connections. MacCrae was found shot dead in his car, with the gun about 25 yards aay, yet the police said he committed suicide!
Is there an Israeli hit-team wandering about the country? In his book "By way of deception", former Mossad agent Victor Ostrowsky tells us that the agency does not hesitate to use criminal actions in other countries if they think it will help Israel. He explains in detail how literally thoudands of jews in Britain alone are organised to help them. Known as "sayanim", they provide cars, safe houses & the like to Mossad agents.
Somthing like that was clearly afoot that night on our ild coast. We will probably never know what, but the curtain of silence which decended over the incident provides a long-term lesson for British Nationalists. It will not be enough one day to replace a few hundred stuffed shirts in Westminster. Thousands of highly trained & motivated journalists and intelligence operatives will be needed to fill the gaps when we clear out the vermin who have betrayed our birthright.

Canadian Airbourne Regiment

The shrill advocates of political correctness have gone crazy in Canada. They have actully been able to get the Canadian Airbourne Regiment disbanded. This was one of the finest regiments in all of Canada too. What great crime did the Airbourne Regt. commit? Did they rebel against the govt. like the French Foreign Legion did in Algeria? No!
Doing duty for the United Nation's Organisation's "peace keeping mission" in Darkest Africa, a sentry caught an African crawling about in the wee sma' hours of the morning.
Suspecting he may have left booby traps lying about (or maybe even poisoned the water supply), some junior Non-Commissioned Officers' (NCO's) beat him up whilst they interrogated him.
One guilt ridden character actully took some photograps of the interrogation - blood, snot and all - all in glorious technicolour. These were handed to politically correct bleeding heart types, and left orientated liberals gave them to the press. This resulted in enormous adverse publicity in the mass-media (owned by you-know-who!), as the NCO's were accused of that unparralled crime of the 20th century "Racism". (Shock! Horror!). When Commissioned Officers protested it was all a storm in a tea-cup, they were all roasted in the self-same media.
So goodbye to the Canadian Airbourne Regiment. Never let it be said that faithful service in the defence of their country should be allowed to out-weigh the burden of political correctness the White Man is increasingly being called to carry out nowdays.
Next time the Canadians (and British) troops are called on to serve the United Nations, or even their own country, they know just what to do. Just keep their heads down in Africa, the Balkans or even in Ulster.
Don't try to stop terrorists or they will be charged with beating them up, racism or even murder if they shoot them in their own self-defence. If any soldier gets blown up by a booby trap, or shot in the back by a Barratt's Sniper Rifle, never mind. At least they will know that they were not "Racists" or murderers when they died in agony.
Am I going crazy in thinking that such conduct is political & military lunacy? Or is there some sinister, bleeding heart conspiratorial group beavering away behind the scenes to undermine the morale of White Soldiers worldwide? Are they using guilt-laden, self-hating Lib-Lab-Con cranks to attain their sinister ends? I wonder!
We are being put into a situation in which we are expected to surrender, rather than defy the liberties won for us by our fathers after hundreds of years of struggle against tyranny. It is now being suggested that we should all trust in the United Nations troops, who willl be from Africa & Asia, sent to bring peace to places like Ulster. But those who have done some reading into the history of the U.N. troops know what they did to the Whites in Africa back in the 1960's, don't we!
To trust the goodwill of people from another Race & Nation than our own is madness!

The Gypsy Plague

In 1998, 1000 Slovak gypsies moved to Britain. They claimed political asylum, saying those "awful" folk in Slovakia were persecuting them. The cost of maintaining therse "refugees" in our National territory is £540,000 a week, paid for by the British tax payer mugs.

Now, thanks to the incredible Mr. David Blunkett (or should that be David Blunder), all of Slovakia's 750,000 Roma gypsies are getting ready to move to Britain. They will be looking for Social Security Benefits, family allowances for the average Roma family of 6-8 children, housing with free rents, plus anything else they can get their mitts on from the Benefits agancy. So multiple 750 by £540,000 and add lots more. This will let you see what British tax-payers will have to pay next year for the masses of Roma about to flood into Britain.

Why does the Labour govt. allow our national territory to be swamped by these alien people, who can't even speak our tongue? It is really sinister! Are they to be the metaphoric "Red Guards" who will bring Britain down?

Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of elderly ex-servicemen in Britain live in poverty through unemployment. Lots are homeless & Blive in what can only be described as doss-houses. Some even sleep rough & it is shameful, because in their younger days these old men & women put life & limb at risk protecting Britain's interests at home & overseas. They fought in vicious brush like Palestine, the Canal Zone, Libya, aden & the Gulf States, Kenya, Malaya, Korea, Saralak, Borneo, Brunei, and more conflicts & foreign wars.

Now the Labour govt. shows favour to "asylum-seekers", and ignores old British ex-servicemen and women, giving two fingers to the British tax-payer.

If you want a Roma for a neighbour, VOTE LABOUR!

ANARCHY IN THE U.K.

Have you noticed at that a lot of young women seem to be joining the anarchist movement here in Scotland? Whilst some of them are hardly the kind a young Briton would want to take them home to show them off to their "mammy", many do appear to be physically attractive. Why on earth would they want to get involved with ararchists, then? Have they never read the history of anarchy in power?

Let me quote from the infamous "Saraloff Decree" passed by the Saraloff Soviet in the newly formed Soviet Union in 1919.

"Beginning with March 1, 1919 the right to possess women between the ages of 17 & 32 is abolished... This Decree however, not applicable to women who have had 5 children... By virtue of the present Decree no woman can any longer be considered as private property and all women become the property of the nation... The distribution and maintenance of the nationalised women, in conformity with the decision of responsible organisations, are the prerogative of the Saraloff anarchists... All women thus put must be at the disposition of the nation after publication of the present decree, must within 3 days present themselves in person at the address indicated and provide all the necessary information... Any man who wishes to use a nationalised woman must hold a certificate issued by the administrative council of a professional union, or by a Soviet of workers, soldiers or peasants, attesting that he belongs to the working-class".

There is lots more foul slime like that in the decree but it has three words which should prove of interest to every young woman who wants to get married to one young man & have children: "All those who refuse to recognise the decree & co-operate with the authorities shall be declared enemies of the people, anti-anarchists & shall suffer the consequences".

As if that were not bad enough, "The Cutchit Decree" of 1929 condoned rape of a woman in these words: "There is no such thing as a woman being violated by a man; he who says that a violation is wrong denies the October Revolution. To defend a violated woman is to reveal oneself as a bourgeois & a partisan of private property".

Thus any man who tried to defend his wife, sister, even his mother from being sexually raped by some scummy communist, would be seen as an enemy of communism, to be treated as a counter-revolutionary & killed.

Is this what the anarchist folk really want out of life?

We hite Patriots who respect our women folk ask if they really want to become the sexual playthings for a bunch of anarchists? If anarchists ever get any power in Britain, they would merely have to go to some committee for a ticket to take any woman of their choice like some donkey at the beach.

We Racial Nationalists call upon White Women to join in the ranks of the racial family movement & work towards an Aryan Europe & the 14 Words.

Open letter to the Christian Press

I had hoped someone, perhaps more qualified than myself would have sprung to the defence of John Calvin, after Dr. George Ella's criticism of him in the "British Church Newsletter", and "English Churchman". To put Calvin into a sort of second division amongst the reformers, to suggest he was somehow deficient compared to others, seems very wrong to me.

Calvin was a Christian Pastor-Teacher who served his master faithfully for years, even at the risk of his own life. By nature he was a quite & scholarly man, and would have preffered to sit in a library & write; but God's providence placed him in the position of being one of the leading lights of Protestantism, with an influence throughout Europe. He could read, write & speak his native French, Latin, Greek & Hebrew.

According to Dr. Wylie's "History of Protestantism" (a must read for all who would learn of our history & our faith), Calvin taught in both the School, and the Achedemy in Geneva. All this was on top of his pastoral duties, which were themselves very weighty.

Despite this heavy workload, Calvin still managed to write over 90 works on the Bible. The men of his day praised his industry, and in the 19th Century, profited out of his works. He wrote fine pastoral letters to the leaders of Christiandom, respectful & courtious, but Biblically based.

All the Reformers of his era respected him as a good brother in Christ, and saw in him an instrument raised up by God's providence to teach the Church the doctrines of the faith. Wylie's "History" is full of praise for Calvin & so is J.H. Merle' - D'Aubigne's. Both historians quote many men who expressed their approbation of God's servant. Dr. Wylie even quotes a Pope & other catholic dignitaries who said John Calvin could not be bought with offers of cash. What a fine testimony to leave behind.

It seems the men of the late 20th & early 21st centuries are adopting hyper-critical attitudes toward Calvin & Luther (see Jude 3 & 4 in this connection). Nowdays the Protestant Reformers are being subjected to very severe criticism. In fact, they are being rubbished. The criticisms are based on a sort of attitude of grovel, in which the demand is being made that we protestants must adopt an oh-so-humble demeanor before our anti-Protestant critics. If we don't it will be said we lack "l-o-v-e". This attitude is epitomised in the Archbisop of Canterbury bowing down to kiss the Pope's ring. Catholic bishops grinned with delight at the abysmal spectacle of the leader of a purportedly national Protestant church humbling himself before a blatent idoliter & anti-Christian heretic like the Pope of Rome. Our critics in their ignorance & self-rightiousness are trying to impose upon us a mantle of guilt that they have woven on their looms. This guilt conditioning can be seen in articles published in the Evangelical Press. The organisers of the "Christian Witness to Israel", John Ross & Mike Moore denounced Calvin & Luther as "anti-semites" (a name of infamy in the contempoary world, as a result of incessant jewish guilt & pity propaganda poured out of the mass-media, which is largely under jewish control). (Oh yes, it is, read Nick Griffin's essay, "The Mindbenders" for proof).

Despite the Editors of the Evangelical Press knowing that, to be called an "anti-semite" is to be given a name of infamy, they made no attempt to publish any defence of our brethern. Look at Raul Hilberg's standard work on the "holocaust". He writes "The missionaries of Christianity had said in effect: you have no right to live among us as jews. The secular rulers who followed proclaimed: you have no right to live among us. The German Nazis decreed: you have no right to live."

Instead of Evangelicals like Ross & Moore criticising this opinion of Dr. Hilberg against the Church of Christ, they side with the jewish critic by saying it is Christian attitudes that hold jews back from turning to Christ, and the poor-poor jews are blameless. Paul's inspired critique of the jews in 1 Thessolonians 2:14-16 should be ignored, it would seem. Thats what the Evangelicals now seem to be saying. I find this attitude on the part of the Evangelicals shocking & reprehensible. It is also theologically unsound. (In this connection read John 3). I ask, is this an indication that the Evangelicals are commencing to depart from the true faith of a Protestant? A faith that was proclaimed faithfully by both Luther & Calvin.

I have read some shocking criticisms directed at the Ulster Protestants in the Evangelical Press. The criticisms are from men, who are well known as opinion makers in the ranks of Evangelicism. The positively sneered at Ulster's Protestants & called them to "l-o-v-e" their Catholic neighbours who were murdering them with bombs, bullets & batterings. I live in Belfast for some years, and saw examples of men being battered in the most literal sense, black and blue. One man's face & arms were bruised bone deep. I've never seen such awful bruising.

If the Evangelical critics had gone up the Falls Road district, and called the Catholics to "l-o-v-e" their Protestant neighbours, they would have been battered into the hospital (or even the morgue) with multiple fractures & deep contusions of their face & body. My brother went up to preach Christ & him crucified off the Falls Rd. He was warned by the hate-filled catholic, "if you don't go away, I'll kill you". Our Evangelical critics know how terrible dangerious it could be to proclaim their "l-o-v-e" doctrine in catholic areas of Ulster, so they reserve them for voicing amongst the Protestants.

On the issue of denouncing Luther & Calvin as "anti-semites", it is ridiculous, even dishonerable to slight our brethern for criticising jews. If everyone who offers criticism of jews is to be traduced as an anti-semite, would that include the Lord Himself? No more fierce critic of jews exists than Jehovah-Elohim. His denuniciations of them for their sins in Isaiah, Jeremiah & Ezekiel are aesome. Perhaps because they are our sins as well?

His dear son, Jehovah-Jesus, told at least some jews: "ye are of your father the Devil, and the works of your father ye do". (see John 8:44-45). Yet Evangelicals like John Ross & Mike Moore insist the jews are God's Chosen People. Will they be moved to say Jesus was an anti-semite for saying what John 8 tells us He said? Shall we denounce the Apostles John & Paul for their criticism of jews in their writings? Must we, to please jews & win them to Chist, accuse John & Paul of being "anti-semites"?

Is it anti-semitism to say there were bad jews like Marx, Lenin, Trotski, Beria, etc. in the International communist movement, or equally bad jews like Mayer Lansky, Longy Zwillman and Dutch Schutz, aka Arthur Flegenheimer, etc. in the US Mafia? The organisation called "Murder Inc." was run by jews in America. For a price you could have an enemy bumped off by callous hitmen.

Let us not forget either, the 300 jewish owned slave ships that sailed out of Newport, Rhode Island off the coast of America, to engage in the cruel & murderous African slave trade across the middle passage. So to enrich their jewish owners, skippers & mostly jewish crews. To give you some idea of the of the vile traffic in human flesh, the slaves were chained in rows like sardines in a can. When they needed to excreate or urinate, their captors did not push down to loosen their chains. So the slaves were forced to relieve themselves where they lay. This meant pools of urine & exrement washed about amongst the chained slaves, as the ships pitched & pailed in the waters of the Alantic. Sailors said you could smell a slave ship a mile off. Sharks followed slavers for weeks on end, to feast off the bodies of slaves who died of disease in such appauling conditions.

When jewish producers in jewish controlled Hollywood, USA turned out movies like "Roots", "Amstad", etc., they did not inform the cinema goers of the massive part played by jews in the slave trade. It is manifest to every discerning Christian that these foul productions are a race & religious war against White Christians. When will the editors in the Christian press denounce & expose this jewish hate propaganda against us? To sit quiet in the face of hate, to let the Christians be reviled without any reply, is surely a betrayal of Christ & his church. "Even-jelly-cals" should be deeply ashamed in my opinion.

While jews should be applauded for their accomplishments, they should not be beyond honest criticism for their faults, out of fear of beinf denounced as an anti-semite, or being punished by God for telling the truth about jews. In my opinion, the organisation, Christian witness to Israel, are a bunch of wimps who grovel with guilt before arrogant, Anti-Christian jews. Some of whom went to plush homes they have in North London. . I used to see these homes as I drove past in the cabin of a heavy lorry. What a luxury! The Christian Witness to Israel "Even-jelly-cals" were drenched with water from an upstairs window by a jewish bigot. Can you imagine if any Christian were to cast a bowl of water over a jew? It would be front page headlines & the Christian would be sent to jail under the anti-Christian, anti-White race laws. But when jews do it to us, we must all grin & turn the other cheek. I mean criticise a poor-poor jew after the holocaust? As if they had not suffered enough! Besides the Lord might punish us. This is the mind-set that prevails among the "Even-jelly-cals". Its disgusting! Its superstition!

One prominant jewish writer did not hesitate to denounce Jesus for his words in John 8:44-45. This jewish critic said that Jesus demonised the jews, and his words exerted an influence on Martin Luther, who write his tract "The jews & their lives". This is purported to have influenced Adolf Hitler & great masses of Germans, by creating a culture of anti-semitism. This ultimately sparked of the "holocaust" in which, it is claimed, that some six million jews were slaughtered with barbarous hate. So we are expected to assent that from Jesus to Luther, Hitler, and "the holocaust" is a straight line. Where is the Christian who will assent to such an intrepretion of his story? Well, could they be found in the ranks of the judaising Evangelicals, I wonder?

I don't accept that Luther had such an influence for a start, Hitler was a catholic & catholic leaders placed a ban on Luther's works. If my memory serves me right, Luther's writings were placed on the catholic index of banned books, and if catholics red them they were putting their eternal salvation at risk, and so must confess to their priest to gain absolution for this great sin. On top of that I've read half-a-dozen or so lives of Adolf Hitler, plus numerious essays. None of them said he was an anti-semite because of his reading Luther or Calvin. Hitler's opposition to jews sprang out of their support for communism & their strident denunciation of other peoples 'nationalism' (But not zionism? That is a special variety of nationalism, to criticise, which leaves the critic under the accursation of being an anti-semite!)

In recent years jews have begun to lobby the catholic authorities & their ecumenical fellow-travellers to get "The New Testament" altered. In those places where perfectly legitimate criticism of jews, they want deleted, why? Well they say the words stir up hatred of jews. What they are demanding is, special consideration for jews. They must be beyond criticism. They can revile us Christians in their "Holy Talmud". I quote "extermination of Christians is a necessary sacrifice. the best of the gentiles should be killed. All non-jewish women are whores". "Even-jelly-cals" say we must not protest. We must turn the other cheek & show jews "l-o-v-e". In that way we will win them to Christ.

Even the Home Secretary, David Blunkett, has been persuaded to put a Bill before parlament soon. This will make it a criminal offence to spread what Mr. Blunkett calls "hate" via religion. Will "The Talmud" be banned then? Don't hold you breath. You can settle it in your mind right now. Blunkett's Bill worded in a way that it will militate against the doctrines of The Church of Christ. Who are Blunkett's advisors?

Will the reading of John 8:44-45, plus 1 Thessolonians 2:14-16 be called "hate speak", and therefore a breach of the new law? Will it lead to Christian pastors in our land being arrested, and put on some charge into the Dock under socialist "anti-hate" laws? Will they even be gaoled for it? Will it become an offence to carry a copy of the authorised version of the Bible, because it contains words now deemed to be "hate-speak"? (He criticised jews & gays, imagine! Gaol the awful Christian bigot! Live & let live, thats my policy). events in Britain & Europe at large seem to be moving towards such a state of repression. Our Christian liberties are being stolen from us. Is this a commencement of a wave of persecution against the Churches of Christ in Britain & Europe at large? And for all proclaiming the God-given doctrines in the old, much despised Bible? Are our Anti-christian governors readying themselves to put thousands of faithful Christians into gaol, so as to establish their policy of social engineering, and erect their system of socialism, with its hatred of the doctrines of Jesus Christ? It looks to me that they have taken the first few tentative steps along that road.

Never forget that the socialists in the USSR were guilty of slaughtering great numbers of confessing Christians during their reign of terror. In his "Gulag" vol. 2. Solzhenitzsyn quotes a statician called Kuganov. He said some 66,000,000 folk were murdered by the communists, mostly confessing Christians. Why were there no "Nurenberg" trials of their murderers? Why is the media silent in the face of these appauling atrocity figures? Are Christian lives less valuable than jewish lives? The silence about their deaths suggest so.

In such a situation it does not seem a good or a wise action on the part of Protestants to direct withering criticisms at Luther & Calvin in the Protestant media. When the doctrines of faith are under such attack as we see now, surely it is the duty of Confessing Christians to stand up for the faith, and the reputation of those who defend it, either in the historical past, or in the contemporary world. I ask, for example, will certain folk demand Luther & Calvin's works be banned because Mike Moore & John Ross said they are "anti-semites"?

Today it is increasingly asserted that it is somehow shameful to be white & Christian. We are being programmed like Pavlov's dogs or Condon's Manchurian candidate to feel oh-so-terribly guilty over our historical past. Non-whites & non-Christians have even said we owe them for the historical past, and should cough up compensation. The late Bernie Grant MP, who was once a member of the aggressive Trotskyite Socialist Labour League, which later became the Worker's Revolutionary Party (Vanessa's lot) demanded the British should give £40,000 to every decendant of black slaves in the West Indies. If you ask where the billions in compensation would come from, the reply would be to borrow it from the bankers. The British taxpayers would borrow it from the bankers. The British taxpayers would pay it all back, plus the interest, but if suffering is to be compensated, what about the millions of British working class folk who suffered dire poverty in foul, vermin infested slums? What about the sacrifice of life & limb in defence of Britain?

I honestly don't expect the Evengelical press to give such a letter space in their columns, and this is why your respectable middle class evengelicals get few working folk in their churches. They prefer the warmth of a Pentecostal church to "cauld kirks" of the Evengelicals.

I am sir, a believer in Jehovah-Jesus.

Zionism - the real Anti-Semitism?

"The Herald" is a newspaper published in Glasgow. recently it reported that organised jewry in France protested, surprise, surprise! Jews protesting? Eh? They do love organising a wail-in, don't they. They know a good wail-in can create masses of political capital for jews and their asggressive little state centre, "Eretz Israel" in the Middle East. On top of that it helps to milk the placid jewish cow, and creates lots of fat-saleried white-collar jobs as wail-in organisers, I mean look at the holocaust.
The jews in France are protesting at the Vatican, you see moves are afoot to make Pius XII (the wartime pope) into a saint. The jews say his failure to protest about the holocaust is hardly the behaviour expected of a saint. Interestingly I once read of a Vatican Official who lived below the pope's quarters. He said Pius XII roared with fear of death, pleading with doctors to save him, as he lay on his death bed. Catholic officials walked around with trembling limbs & white faces. If the pope was afraid to die, how would they face the reaper when he was swinging his sythe? The official incidently quit the cathoclic church & joined the church of Christ, an American organisation.
Getting books on the holocaust is really difficult, if these books are critical of holocaustmania with its six million dead jews tale. You just can't walk into bookshops & pick works by Robert Farisson, or Ernst Zundel off the shelves. If any such books were given an open display, the left-wing book burners in the Socialist Workers Party (which is stacked out with jews) would hold a demo outside the shop.
They did it with a shop in Suchiehall street, which was selling books by David Irving. I've read a number of Irving's books, they are really well-written & so very informative; but just because he criticises the fallicious nature of the present-day interpretation of the WWII, the left-wing book burners hate his guts. The editor in "The Herald" agreed with the SWP's protest. But it was right out of Orwell's 1984, where all information contrary to the party line is consigned to "the memory hole", with its intensely hot flame. The party line, of cource is the holocaust & the evil Nazi gassers tale.
My reading of the Vatican's attitude toward the jews in WWII suggest that the pope did more for the jews than the zionists ever did. I've read he told catholic monasteries and convents throughout Europe to take jews as refugees. He also took lots of jews into hids Palatial residence in Castel Candolfo, more jews were given Vatican passports which allowed them to go into other lands without any problems.
Note that I'm not a Roman Catholic seeking to white-wash the pope. I'm actully a reformed protestant in my doctrinal belief, and to us Calvinists the pope is a heritic; but historical truth must be given a hearing, regardless of how many holocaust maniacs are offended by it. So here goes with the truth from my historical researches.
In New York a jewish lawyer named Morris Ernst sought to gain political asylum in the USA for his fellow jews, who were inside Nazi occupied Europe. He used his friendship with Presisent Roosevelt (who was of jewish descent) to get them into America. You can read about this in "The Zionist Connection" by Al Lilienthal, who was the editor of the jewish newsletter in the USA.
Roosevelt sent Ernst to Britain as his personal representitive. Britain was at war; but Prime Minister Churchill took time off his boozing sessions to see Ernst. Churchill agred to take in jewish refugees & give them political asylum in Britain & our world-wide Empire. This should not surprise us, Churchill was of jewish orgin. When Ernst went back to NY leading jews told him, "you're a traitor to zionism". It was alright for them, they lived in the comfort and safety of America.
You see the zionists wanted Europe's jews to move en masse into Palestine, where zionism sought to erect its state structure after the war. Thus any moves to give jews political asylum in any other land bar Palestine, was opposed by the zionist zealots sitting in leather armchairs in NY, etc. In lots of cases the opposition of the zionists was based on the belief that a vast influx of zionist jews with their beard, dark garb, round hats would present problems for US jews. They were mostly assimiliated into western society. In fact they were frequently irreligious, even athiests, who despised orthodox jews, and saw them as backward and reactionary. Talk about anti-semitism.
Sweden offered to take in 60,000 jewish refugees. The Chief Rabbi in Sweeden was a zionist & objected. He said so many jews flooding in would raise anti-semitism among the tolerant Swedish people. In Denmark some concerned folk took jews across to Sweden at night, the Swedes gave them political sylum, which more that the hard hearted US zionists were prepared to do.
Britain actully brought a bill before parlament. It called for jews to be to be given asylum in Britain & our former world-wide Empire. You can read a letter in "The Times" of London on the anniversary of D-Day, it was written by a jewish Rabbi appointed Chief Organiser of the rescue committee. He said "Britain was at her best" in offering asylum to jews. It was the zionists who said "why not Palestine?"
The answer is obvious. If millions of jews were being persecuted in Nazi occupied Europe, surely they would be pushed into any land that would offer them asylum. To send them to Palestine to be maintained in camps by UK & US taxpayers, could have stirred up terrorists in the Arab nations to fight them with the Nazis. They could've blown up oil refineries. This would have cut Britain off from Middle East oil refineries, and you can't fight a war with no oil. Thus Britain would have been defeated. How would that help the jews?
The jews should have been taken to any land that would give them succour. After the war the refugee problem could have been sorted out. But the zionists reasoned that the jews would stay in the lands that gave them asylum. They would not move to Israel, the zionist state structure they planned to set up after the war. So these zionist zealots opposed giving jews asylum anywhere other than in Palestine.
This means that jews who ended up in Nazi concentration camps did so largely as a consequence of zionist intrangience. The zionists used their political clout (which was immence) to lock them up inside Nazi occupied Europe. Thus, if six million jews were slaughtered lilke the zionist propaganda incessantly tells us in movies, TV, books, newspaper articles, then the zionists share the guilt of their deaths. The Lord God said to Cain, after he murdered Abel, "The voice of they brother's blood cries unto me from the ground". The voice of dead jews blood in WWII cries out against the zionists. Britain, Sweden & America were ready to give jews asylum. The zionists hindered their rescue attempts.
Lots of jews went into the Soviet Union. We read of train loads of Red Army troops coming into Eastern Europe, and returning crammed full of jewish refugees. I suspect we'll never know how many jews went into the USSR in these rescue trains. In fact any attempt to research their numbers would be reviled as anti-semetic attempts to whitewash Hitler & the Nazis. It is a sneaky form of holocaust denial, and one jewish professor in England thinks that deniers of the holohoax should be gaoled. Is'nt it appauling, the bigotry of the holocaustmaniacs?
It seems to me that the worst anti-semites were the zionists. Not only did they despise religious jews, they also blew up shiploads of jewish refugees in the Mediterranian. Zionists were no friends of the jews. I think jews are suckers to trust any zionist after the way they betrayed jews in WWII.
In my opinion, the zionists want jewish capital, jewish labour & jewish cannon-fodder into Eretz Israel, the gigantic ghetto the zionists are building behind those high walls, their barbed wire fences, their mine fields. The zionists want their very own jewish population to tax to the bone. This will enable the zionist leaders to live La Dolce Vita. Jews should wake up to the cunning ploy of the zionists. But they've been programmed twith guilt to such an extent, they side with their zionist betrayers against non-jews who try to warn them. They'll even call me an "anti-semite" for writing such material. Gerry Gable did in his evil hatesheet "Searchlight".
Right now the zionists peddle guilt to try to make jews living in the West make their personal aliyah to Israel. But the zionists won't be satisfied with guilt politics. Eventully they'll start terroristic activities to stir up fear of anti-semitism. They did it in Arab lands, and blew up synagogues & other places frequented by jews. I heard an Israeli lecture on those days in the Strathclyde Union. His name was Akiva Aur (I think that was the spelling). He was brought to the Union by Dr. george mitchell who was drowned in very suspicious circumstances. Yet Dr. Mitchell could swim like a seal. I'm persuaded that future days will lend support to my analyis. Just wait & see.

Ban the bomb & the Bolshy Bastards

The Ban the Bomb brigade announced their intention to hold a rally in George Square, Glasgow. They are mostly lefties as far as I can gather, with a sprinkling of bleeding heart liberals (scratch a liberal & you'll find a red underneath).
They have said publically that dropping nucular bombs on to enemy targets is evil; but there appears to be another reason for their protest. They object strongly to the billions of pounds the govt. is going to spend o Trident nucular submarines, and say they can think of better ways to spend such vast sums of cash.
You see the govt. have borrowed billions of pounds off the bankers, and now they have to pay it back with the inevitable interest. This means the govt. has to reduce expenditure in certain areas. Thus our troops have been sent out to fight Islamic terrorists waging guerrilla war in Iraq & Afganistan. These British troops lack things like body armour & helecopters, in fact lots of their equipment appeas to be clapped out.
Believe it or not, the British troops had a rifle, the SA80, which had a mechanical problem. This meant the machine which carried the actual bullets would fall out at unexpected moments. Thus when a soldier was sighting on a terrorist coming at him with an AK47 (Kalashnikov) his magazine would fall out. Happily for the British soldiers, this defect seems to have been corrected.
Its just as well, really, because a burst from an AK47 could cut a man in half. But it was'nt about such mundane matters the ban the bomb brigade were protesting, down in George Square, no! They had much more important reasons for their demo.
You see these ban the bomb lefties seem mostly to be employed in fat-saleried, white-collar jobs in the public sector of the British economy. It appears that the govt. are running some of these jobs down. Thus now lots of the lefties look as if they will lose their jobs. In fact it seems that thousands have been paid off from their cushy jobs in various parts of the UK, and tens of thousands more look as if they will follow them. These public sector drones are beginning to tremble over the prospect of unemployment and poverty. The govt. has sought to reduce the impact somewhat by paying out early retirement to older drones. If you look at the job pages in "The Guardian" you'll see the kind of mickey mouse jobs I mean, and you'll understand why I call them useless drones & parasites, living fat off the taxpayers backs.
So its the threat of unemployment in the public sector that is principally motivating the ban the bomb brigade to hold their public rally. But they can't come right out & say it, so they adopt the cunning policy that they are concerned about the awful dangers of nucular war. They can think of better ways to spend such vast sums, like using the cash to protect their fat-salaried, white collar jobs.
They intend by their inflamitory propaganda, to stir up millions of workers, after all, its our cities where we live that will be the targets, if any vast war were to commence. So their propaganda is designed to create fear in the hearts of working class folks, and terrify them with the prospect of a war that would kill off their old mums & dads, their lives & little children. Its a cunning ploy to gain mass support for a demo which in essence is designed to protect the jobs of the trendy lefties.
Its really sickening to hear them mouthing their platitudes of concern for us working class folk. In reality they despise us, even hate us. George Galloway M.P. is a characteristic trendy leftie. He has lived off the backs of British tax payers for most of his useless life. Yet he called white workers "scum" when he handed out leaflets at the senior school in his former constituancy in Hillhead, up in the West End. I saw the comment in the vile hatesheets that are printed down on Clydeside.
One of these hatesheets sent out its photographer to get photos of working class BNP members out protesting at their hard lives. The hatesheet printed these photos in their pages & asked readers to send in names & addresses of the subjects, plus their places of employment. Look what happened.
Journalists went into their employers and got them the sack into unemployment & poverty. One of the working class folk. They want to transfere the cash spent on weapons of defence, and apply it to the protection of their fat salaried, mickey mouse jobs in the public sector of the economy.
From my own personal experience, I know that NALGO-UNISON loathes us British Nationalists. They use their political clout to drive us off the streets "By any means necessary". That was how they worded a motion put before NALGO at their conference in the 1980's. When I wrote letters of protest, the evil cops sided with NALGO against me. I ended up in a cell for 5 days, and even lost my home in a Maryhill tenrment, and ended up sleeping on the streets. The evil cops shunted me round in handcuffs with vicious criminal types. Cops & the left ganging-up on us white workers, then the cops wail that workers won't help them with their enquiries, what do they expect? They're not our police. They side with the left against us.
Building nucular subs means employment for lots of blue-collar workers in the steel industry, shipyards & engineering; but the trendy lefties are not blue collar workers they are the new bourgeoise, what Milovan Djilas called "The New Class" in his book of that name. The ban the bomb brigade could not care less about the workers in industry. They are too busy looking out for their own useless jobs which create no wealth.
Its time white workers wakened up the fact that the left are not our friends, in fact they despise, even hate us. In fact they despise, even hate us. They will get us gaoled to stop our protests which expose their arrogant pride and hyprocritical tyranny.

Jew-ry Falwell

Jerry Falwell was can American televangelist with an immense influence in the US. He as also a judeo-Christian who subscribed to the Scofield reference bible, Dakes annointed reference bible, & Hal Lindsay's book "The Late Great Planet Earth". This last book sold 38,000,000 copies & has a massive impact in the US. Basically it says the jews will rule the earth for 100 years. Jews love it of cource; but it has not made them become Christians. They still don't believe in Christ.
One night Falwell got a phone call all the way from Israel in the Middle East. The caller was the Israeli PM, Menachen Begin, who sought to use the massive influence of Falwell. Begin wanted weaponry off the US; but some folk in the US administration were holding it back. When Begin set down the phone at his end, Falwell used a special number to dial President Reagan. He told the American president (who was a deeply supersticious man) that God wanted him to help israel. Reagan gave the order, and Israel got hold of the weaponry it wanted. That is power & influence in operation. Begin was so pleased that he gave Falwell the gift of a lear jet.
I thought of the lowly carpenter of Nazereth. He had no-where to lay his head, and his name was on a secret blacklist so that he could not get any employment at his trade (I think that is a fair interpretation at one time in his career). He rode into the city of Jerusalem on a donkey (and it was borrowed). Yet heres confessing Christians riding in lear jets, and cadillacs. They live in mansions with swimming pools. Some even live in palaces like the Vatican or Lambeth Palace. What a contrast between their life style & that of Jesus the unemployed, blacklisted carpenter of Nazareth.
Look at Falwell's help given to Begin. Yet that man said communism was okay when it was run by jews, this okay communism slaughtered some 6 million confessing Christians in the days ogf Lenin & Trotsky, 1917-34. In the days of Stalin, the communists slaughtered 66,000,000 people in the USSR, mostly confessing Christians.
Joachim Hoffman's historical study, "Stalin's war of extermination", tells us that the evil powers in Eastern Europe & Western Russia have so far dug up so far over 100,000 pits of dead bodies. The victims were shot in the back of the head by the Soviet CHEKA, which was under the command of jews; but Begin said communism was okay when jews ran it. They only murdered confessing Christians, & anti-semitism was a capital crime, so it as okay in Begin's eyes, and Jerry Falwell helped that evil, callous, back shooting terrorist bomber of British troops.

The secret state

I read your material on men who worked as agents for the British State, and were betrayed by them. I had a similar experience, only I was not a foreigner; but a full-blooded, unhyphenated Brit. I was born in this land, and after a fashion, given my education in its schools. I served in the armed forces on a regular army engagement.
My father & six of his sons served in the armed forces of the British Crown in various theatres of War. Three of them died as a consequence of military service. We were a family of patriots, despite our lowly, working class orgins. . I recall reading an article in "The Times" of London. It was on young upper middle-class type who was killed in action in the RAF. The "Times" writer said he displayed patriotism, somthing that seems to have died in contemporary Britain.
I wrote in to contrast the hero of "The Times" with my own family. Where he was a wealthy, upper-class type with an Oxford education, and had somthing to fight for, we lived in the slums of Glasgow. Our educational attainments had just about taught us to read and write and count. Yet we were no less patriotic than him. The editor did not even deign to reply to me.
I was the least educated among my family, having left school at the age of 11. Yet I enlisted in the army as soon as I was old enough to do so. I served the Crown loyally in Britain, the Middle East, far East & in Ulster.
I got information that some left-wingers intended starting up a terrorist campaign like the IRA. As a soldier I had been programmed to take problems to higher authority & this is what I did. I phoned the police, who put me in touch with Special branch, and later on, MI5. They asked me to help them, and I agreed (what a sucker I was).
I told the officers of State that the terrorists wanted to get their comrades our of gaol. They planned to do it in two way, 1) by smuggling arms into the gaol, 2) by kidnapping a couple of high officers of State, and holding them to ransom for the release of their comrades.
When these comrades had been released from the gaols, and put on a plane for Libya, with a sum of cash, the terrorists intended murdering the two officers of State. They did not want them to be able to identify them later on.
The men in gaol had contacts with the PLO. One actully knew Yasser Arafat on a personal basis. Thus, they would have joined the ranks of the PLO, which was engaged in acts of terrorism. White men would have been an important edition to the PLO, and could get to places denied to non-whites (eg., British army camps, etc.).
I passed all this information (intelligence if you like) to officers of state. I also told them that the terrorists had robbed banks to get funds to pay into their war chest. When I saw these officers of State adopted a sort of could'nt care less attitude to the information I had got, at considerable risk to myself, I reasoned that they must have someone in the ranks of the terrorists feeding them more vital information. I even speculated that the terrorists were actully being run by said officers of state, with some devious end in view. Remember Combat 18 was being run by British Intelligence, and it is asserted that some of the Loyalist gun-gangs were used by British Intelligence.
One officer of State, himself an ex-regular army man, told me (joking like) that they would let the IRA know about me. It was intended to menace & intimidate me; but I only felf contempt for the Officer & his mates. I stopped helping them. If they could not trust me, how could I trust them?
As a consequence of helping these officers of the British State, my name ent on to a blacklist, and I could not get a job in my trade. The foul scum in the Special Branch & MI5 would not help me to get a job. as a consequence I went into 20 years of unemployment & poverty. My marriage broke up, and I have not seen my family gfor years. In fact, I don't even know where they live. It caused me much sorrow of heart. One might imagine I had been the terrorist, rather than the loyal British patriot.
I actully ended up homeless, living on a small army pension. I finally went to my brother's home in Ulster (ex-Royal Navy, WW2 years). There I took up self-employment; but Ulster was a terribly dangerous place for me to live. The IRA/INLA/IPLO would have shot me dead without a second thought, just in case, you know.
Whilst engaged in my work I heard about a plan to shoot down a helicopter that flew over West Belfast. as an ex-British soldier I felt I could not ldet the soldiers in the chopper be murdered. Thus, I told an army patrol hat I knew. They called an RUC man, and I made a statement to him. The security forces raided a couple of houses in West Belfast, and got hold of two machine guns. One was of Russian make, and the other a bren gun altered to fire 7.62mm ammunition. The last had been stolen from an army post by an Irish mob. The soldiers were afrais to shoot at them in case they were arrested for shooting the poor, poor Irishmen struggling for national self-determination.
Both these weapons had the capicity to shoot down the British army helecopter. The idea was light up a bundle of tyres. they burn fiecrely, and emit a thick black smoke. The chopper would fly over to see what was going on, and the IRA would open up with both guns on rapid fire. They would have killed the crew, and the chopper would have been shot down. The irish nationalists would have rejoiced over the slaughter, and the morale of the Broitish troops, already very low, would have fallen even further.
I got a life up the M6 with a serving soldier. He was a junior NCO, and told me he was in the same unit as the two British corprals murdered on TV. He had actully seen the murder of his mates from a control van with TV's inside. The whole grisly spectacle was actully viewed by senior army & RUC officers. They had 400 men with arms just a few hundred yards away; but they would not order them in to rescue the two British corprals. They were afraid a riot would break out and would provide material to the Irish-American TV geeks. So they sat & watched the two loyal NCO's being brutally murdered. Should we British give our loyalty to such callous men? Not in my view!
The Corpral who gave me a lift told me the morale of the troops was very low. No matter what they did the mass media rubbished them. He said he had been in the army 9 years, and was in line for promotion to sargeant's rank; but was going to quit. The government never made any attempt to lend the troops support. They seemed to grovel with guilt over their involvement in Ulster, which is after all part of the British Isles by a treaty signed by IRA leaders in the aftermath of the Irish rebellion. we can see what the Lib/Lab/Con's thought of the whole affair. Alan Clark, the former Tory MP said we should pull out & leave the Ulstermen to fight it out with the Irish Republic themselves. Of cource, this is not what the Ulstermen did with Britain in two world wars. They sacrificed life & limb in defence of Britain; but when our Officers of State have no more use for us, they cast us aside like dirty sanitary towels.
We even saw the spectacle of Arthur Scargill & George Galloway going up to the spare ground in Springhill, Glasgow to an IRA/Sinn Fein festival. On the platform Scargill gave Gerry Adams a bear hug to a tremendous cheer from the IRAS supporting mob, while Galloway grinned like the cat that got the cream, as indeed he had. Here was a man being paid by the British to represent their national interest in the London parlament, yet he stoof on the platform with IRA chieftans like Gerry Adams. These same IRA men had shot British soldiers,policemen & civilians dead. This shows us that the left are anti-British traitors. Yet they were treated better than me, the loyal unhypenated Brit. Surely our nation has been captured by an enemy.
We see that my involvement with the officers of the British state, amongst other things, helped save the lives of high officers of state, plus the lives of prison officers. It also helped save the lives of the crew on that helicopter, plus the chopper itself. What was my reward? I ended up ith a broken marriage, jobless, estranged from my own family. I even had to sleep on the streets under an old army poncho & sleeping bag. I tried to get jobs in other cities; but no joy.
I even lost all my personal belongings & my very home itself. This is how officers of state reward loyalty in Britain today. So my advice to anyone who is helping these officers of state is, stop it right now. They will do you down if it suits these scum. I have now taken up study of the conspiracy theory, and embrace it whole heartedly. It explains what was done to me, becase we now have a left-wing government, pushing on us policies that can only harm our nation. Our land is being samped by alien people who hate us & think that we owe them for the historical past.
It is time for the National Revolution to free our land from traitors.

USS Liberty & the zionist cover up

I gave a quiet jeer when I read your piece on the assault on the USS Liberty. It was a real white wash of Israel & the double-dealing of the zionist jews who reside in the United States. In fact I see it as an attempt to blame the assault on L.B.J., who is now dead & cannot defend himself against the horrible slur on his character. In a few words it is all intended to get the threacherous self-seeking jews off the hook.

What actully took place is this. The spy section on board the Liberty picked up wireless traffic from the Sinai Desert. This was the Jordanian army, telling them the Egyptian army had broken through the Israeli lines, and were heading north. The Jordanians were advised to attack Israel, so that together they could drive the jews into the sea. The wireless traffic was actully in the code used by the Egyptian & Jordanian armies.

CIA analysts on the Liberty concluded that the wireless traffic was fake. It was obvious to them that MOSSAD had broken the Arab code, and was setting up a scam to incite Jordan to make an assault upon Israel. The Israelis actully had massive concentrations of tanks & planes waiting to use the excuse of a Jordanian assault to smash through Jordan's army & occupy Jordan all the way to the desert on the other side. Israel claims Jordan was given to them in the days of Moses & Joshua. As Menachen Begin put it some years ago: "There are two banks to the River Jordan, and both belong to us".

The CIA section wirelessed CIA HQ in Washington DC. Their Director took signal into L.B.J. immediatly. In a rage, he immediatly called the Israeli ambassado & shouted him down, warning him that the Israeli's arrogant imperialism could stir up WWIII between the Soviet Union & America. L.B.J decried the Mad Masada mentality that dwells in the breast of so many jews.

The Israeli ambassador wirelessed the jewish leaders in Tel Aviv to inform them of L.B.J.'s hot anger. They asked how did L.B.J. find out about the fake wireless traffic, from Sinai to Jordan? Their consular officials phoned round highly-placed zionist jews in DC. They round out about the USS Liberty from the contacts. The information was wirelessed to Israel. This was an act of treason against the U.S. by these threacherous zionist jews, who should have been tried for it, and put to death for their treasonous behaviour which caused the deaths & woundings of so many loyal Americans.

Israel sent out a spy plane to find the Liberty. Its markings were perfectly clear to the men on the ship. In fact some of them even waved to the Israeli pilots overhead. I mean, was not Israel America's loyal ally in the Middle East, which they armed with some five billion dollars of weaponary every year (says Ed Fields of "The Truth At Last" published in Marietta, Georgia, an honest & fearless critic of jewish perfidy in the US). The pilot of the Israeli jet, who is said to have been an American jew, actully born in America, flew around the Liberty, and wireless its position back to his base. There was absolutly no mistake. The ship had a large Stars & Stripes flying in the breeze straight from the mast. It alse had US identification marks on the side of the Liberty.

When the Israeli plane flew away, Israeli jets came & attacked the Liberty. They shot it up with cannon fire. The ship was defenceless. It had only one machine gun to be used in defending itself from Arab terrorists, ho might come along side & toss a satchel-bomb on board. Israeli MTB's came and fired a torpedo which struck the Liberty amidships, destroying the CIA spy section, and burning up its documentation of the Sanai signals. You can actully see the photos of these Israeli MTB's in "Soldier of Fortune" magazine, taken by members of the crew of the Liberty during the actual assault.

At least one Israeli helecopter (given by the USA to her brave little ally in the Middle East) came to the Liberty. It was chock-a-block with Israeli commandos. Their Commander asked the Liberty if they needed any help. What appauling phonies! Kill you friends & then ask them if they need any help. Is'nt that just typical of the hyprocritical zionist jews.

The Liberty had wireless for help, and planes from the Sixth Fleet flew to their aid. These planes were armed for war; but were recalled by an express order from DC. The conclusion is that highly placed zionist jews used their immence political clout in America to stop the US jets shooting down the Israeli jets, and shooting up the Israeli MTB's, as this could have started a war between the US & Israel. Jewish power is so strong in America (and here in Britain as well) that few rish their ire lest they come to hard from these appauling bigots, the jews.

When the Liberty limpted into Malta, its crew were given explicit orders not to talk about the ugly incident, on pain of being court marshalled under very serious charges. The crew were disperssed all over the US Navy ships in various theatres of the world. It is manifestly a rotten cover up of jewish zionist threachery against the US.

If Peter Hounman's book is anything like your review of it, then he is perpertrating one more cover up of the threacherous jewish assault on the USS Liberty. Perhaps he has read the lesson of what happened to Andrew Neil, former editor of "The Sunday Times". It as under his editorship that the assault on the Liberty was first made public, years after the event. Neil also publicised the revelations of Mordeccai Vanunu about Isreali nucular power at Dimona.

Neil left the editorship of "The Sunday Times" when he was appointed anchor man in Rupert Murdoch's proposed New York TV programme. The zionist jews in America appear to have worked a secret boycott on Andrew Neil, to stop the programme ever being broadcast. What? Have a man who tells the truth about Eretz Israel being given air-time in the Jew-nited States? You have to be kidding! Murdoch, who is of Scots-jewish orgins, gave Neil a golden handshake, and that was a critic of zionist double dealing silenced in America.

Its time that magazines like "Eye Spy" told the truth about jewish threachery in our lands. It is a species of imperialism, the rule of jews in other lands, beavering away on behals of Eretz Israel, an aggressive anti-Christian state in the Middle East which uses us "goyim" as cannon fodder to fight their wars of expansionism, and prop up their ugly, bigoted racist state.

If we don't break the power of international zionist imperialism in our western lands, the jews will drag us into a third World War. Right now they are saying that the Ezekiel prophecy in chapters 38 & 39 are nearing fulfillment. What are these prophecies? Well they will have us believe Russia will flood into the Middle-East via the great passes in the Caucasus Mountains, to attack poor little Israel. But Russia will be given a devestating defeat. This is the theme of religious fanatics like Hal Lindsey in his book, "The Late Great Planet Earth" (which sold 20,000,000 copies by the 1970's, and has helped to programme scores of millions of American Fundamentalist Christians all over that great Republic).

I believe that all zionist jews should be kicked out of western lands, and made to accept the citizensip which is theirs under the Israeli law of return. Let the make their precious "aliyah" they all wail about. In Eretz Israel they can just be jews like all their tribe. They will not offend us with their threachery & double-dealing.

I have not put my address for very obvious reasons. To do so leaves honest British patriots like me open to attacks in the streets near my home at night by evilly-disposed jews and their left-wing cohorts. For defending myself against their assaults, I was pulled up in Sauchiehall street by Chief-Inspector McNeil of Glasgow Special Branch. He warned me that I would be prosocuted for fighting in the streets at night. Gerry Gable of the jewish hate-sheet "Searchlight" magazine, wrote a piece in his magazine accusing me of having sent him a used condom, and of carrying a bread knife to carve up the thugs and hooligans he calls "anti-fascists". The idea is to provoke hatred against me in the breast of the naive young lefties, so that they will attack me and try to injure me. Since I am proported to carry a bread knife, they will obviously bear a similar weapon. Right? And feel justified in sticking it in my back some dark night.

I am pushing toward 70 years of age. Never in all that time have I carried a bread-knife. Nor did I send gable a used condom. Its all lies he punts; but still the National Lottery awards him £156,000 for attacking people he calls "nazis", "fascists", "anti-semites", "white supremacists", Blah! Blah!

Willie MacRae - unanswered questions

Willie MacRae was a Glasgow lawyer who died a mysterious and violent death. It is said he committed suicide with, I understand two shots to the head. Two shots!

His car was run off the road up the West Coast. The door on the drivers side was jammed up a bank of earth, impossible to open. The door in the passengers side was locked from the inside. The lawyers' body was in the driver's seat, slumped at the wheel. The rear windscreen had been entirely removed, all the rubber pulled out.

In his wallet MacRae kept a £500 note, the price of his first legal fee as a solicitor. It was missing.

The gun was found 25 yards away by the police, lying on the ground. Ask yourself, how could a man committing suicide do such a thing? Could he shoot himself in the head, open his offside door, toss the gun 25 yards away, close the door, lock it & lie back in the drivers seat & die? I think you'll agree its ridiculous. Yet this is the senario the cops have projected for our consumption and the media has largely ignored the story. Why?

Shades of a conspiracy theory

Germany has been paying reparation to Germany since the 1960's in the shape of material goods, aerodromes & hospitals with medical supplies. A few years ago 3 German submarines were handed over (they do know how to build subs, don't they?) Not long afterwards an Israeli submarine surfaced off the West coast of Scotland during the midnight hour. In the darkness an indeterminate number of Israeli agents landed. They were met by another Israeli agent & taken by him in a vehicle down the lond & winding road towards Glasgow.
Not many people know it, but the West coast of Scotland of choc-a-block with very important people who inhabit plush homes in the region. Because of this the cops maintain a high profile in the area. Police stopped the vehicle carrying the Israeli agents. The spies were arrested & later deported as "illegal immigrants". The mind boggles at this cover up. The press in Scotland censored the news of this blatently unfriendly action towards Britain by Israel.
I read about the incident in a one inch column in a popular Sunday newspaper printed in Glasgow. Surely a story like that was worth a three page spread? Could the journalists not have asked what the Israeli agents were doing in our country? It appears they weren't here to see an Old Firm match or visit the Edinburugh festival. I think we can take it they were up to no good. We know that in the past Israeli agents have gone to other countries to murder people they percieve as enemies. When those big jets rammed into the Twin Towers in NY some people, later identified as Israeli spies were seen jumping about in delight & exchanging high 5's. They even lived on the same street as the Arabs who has purportedly hijacked the planes & flew them into the Twin Towers, murdering thousands of innocent civilians. Why they should delight in an appauling act of mass-murder demands an answer, and so does the story of the Israeli submarine.
Who was the agent ho met the men from the sub? Where did he live? Was it Glasgow's Hillhead district, just behind Suite 131? Or in affluent Newton Mearns where so many supporters of the state of Israel live good, comfortable lives, eating British bread whilst owing loyalty to a foreign state in the Middle East, whose guerilla terrorists blew up British soldiers in sneak bomb attacks, or ambushed them.
Two British NCO's were actully hanged by the terrorists, and their murdered bodies booby trapped with explosives to kill more troops. One of the murdered NCO's was himself jewish.
Did the police search the home of the Israeli agent stopped on his way from the West Coast? If they did, did they find the paraphernalia of spying; long range wireless sets, secret code books, lists of names of critics of Israel for possible assassination? Did they find arms, secret poisons or bomb making equipment? Did the cops even obtain a warrant to search the agent's home? Or if they are, the media is censoring the news. Why?
The retired Labour MP for Linlithgow Tam Dalyell spoke of a powerful jewish cabal in America using its immense political clout to incite the USA to attack Iraq. I ask, is there a similar jewish cabal operating here in Britain, using its power to silence any criticism of Israel following the apprehension of the agents landed by sub?
Someone once said: you can fool all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time. It seems to me that the Lab/Lib/Cons in Westminster have sent our soldiers out to gight for Israel. Why? Leave the Israelis to fight their own battles.

Plague of Rats

Walking along the North bank of the Clyde, I saw a big rat. He was as bold as brass & sat upon his haunches looking at me out of his ruby coloured eyes. He was scoffing some tit-bit held in his fore paws which he had scavanged from an open bin. You see workers come out of the Daily Record office on good days & eat their lunch by the riverside. When they're finished, they dump their left overs in an open bin. I've even seen some waste food dropped on the ground by the seats. Rats flourish on this left-over food & it represents a danger to the folk in the flats in the converted former dock shed. You see all these flats have sliding doors on their wee verandas. In the arm weather folk leave these doors open & rats could go into the flats.

Could you imagine a big dock rat with its nest in your home, perhaps in the couch or the bed mattress? This is Labour's Glasgow & your actual Labour lefties all chant the litany of "we care for the workers". The fact that rats are swarming in our working-class areas says somthing else. I saw a rat catcher putting down poison opposite Wyndford housing estate in Maryhill rd. at the old Maryhill barracks site. He spread a creamy blue paste round drainage pipes. The rats wriggle through them on their way to feed on human left-overs from junk food shops. The poison goes on to the rats fur & they lick it off or it enters their blood via their skin & they die.

Walking through a lane by Hope street opposite the Savoy Cntr I saw a notice up on a rone pipe. This said poisoned bait had been put down to kill vermin & warned the public to watch their pets. The same notice was put up on Balmore Rd. & rats were seen in the back courts up Saracen street. You see folk cast their rubbish out in plastic shopping bags. Dogs come into the back courts & haul the bags out of the open middens & strew their contents over the back courts on the search for tit bits.

Rats come out at night & feast on this garbage & they flourish: Clydeside, Cowcaddens, Maryhill & Possilpark. One man walking through the back court at night up off Saracen street. He saw the ground swarming with rats & hastily departed. He said with a wry laugh "I did'nt want them running up my trouser legs". He told the binmen about it but the rats still seem to be there.

Is'nt it time the sleek fat cats down in George Square got off their fat behinds and did somthing about these verminious creatures? After all they're getting fat saleries for acting as our govenors.

Rats carry 26 diseases and are deadly to the health of mankind. Among them are the awfull plague. The plague broke out last century in the Gorbals. It was caused by swarming rats who fed on the open middens. The fleas on the rats carry the plague germs & people in Glasgow died from coming into contact with the rats. Plague holds no class barriers.

The warm weather is ideal for rats breeding. This is the perfect condition for the outbreak of plague. It has been said that once the plague has been in place it is always there just waiting to break out again given the right conditions.

It was once said that a young mother in Glasgow put her baby out in the back court. She wanted to clean her home & left the window open. She would check to see her baby was safe. What she saw sent her running down the stairs screaming with horror, a rat was climbing into the pram in Labour's Glasgow.

I'll bet there are no rats where Tony lives, or Gordon or Robin in EH2 unless you count the two legged variety!

The IRA, then, now & in the future

Above - IRA Scum on British Streets.

Those IRA supporters marching through Glasgow & other British cities, disgust me. They eat British bread but root for the killers of British people.

The Orange Order wanted to march in Dublin, the IRA came out in force shouting "I-I-IRA". They tossed stones at the Garda & put windows in in 0'connel street. The 0range march was banned. Yet the cops protect IRA marches here in Glasgow, and "The Digger" calls those who protest about it "sectarian", which is a name of reproach from lefties.

Why are they supporting the IRA in Glasgow? Is not the war over? Or is it just a con job to allow the IRA to regroup. We've seen the Continuity & Real IRA engaging in acts of terrorism in Ulster.

I think it would be a good idea to dig a wide canal right through Ulster, beginning at the "Point", they could take it to the Alantic on the West coast & all the Irish could then be deported to their precious Republic that they love so much, they vote with their feet against it. Ireland would then be surrounded by water.

With a Causeway linking Ulster to the south of Scotland (the Ulster Causeway & the Ulster canal). It would devolop trade & make Ulster completely a part of Britain. They've done big civil engineering jobs on a comparable scale, the Suez Canal, the Panama canal, the Corinta canal, plus lots more. With modern digging machines, it would'nt take very long.

If they don't do somthing like this, the IRA intend clearing out the prods and settling them all over Ireland, I've read that in their literature. Once they get them seperated, they'll massacre them, out of the public eye of cource. They're evil bigots.

Gerry Adams was asked by some "Stickies" (Official/Marxist IRA) in jail, what did he plan to do. He said he was prepared to wade up to his knees in protestant blood to get to a United Ireland. Notice the empathis with him, "protestant blood". Its a religious war with him.

Ian Paisley says theres an empty seat in Brussels that will be occupied by the Pope one day. We know Papal Power is increasing every year. Personally as a working-class man, I don't see what the Pope or Archbishop of Canterbury have to say to us. Both live in palaces, the Vatican & Lambeth. In fact the Pope is King in the Vatican.

Cuckoo in the nest

If you read the so-called "quality press", you'll notice frequent letters in support of Israel. These are written by jews living in Britain.

I always wonder if its bad conscience that motivates such letter writers. Do they feel they should be living in Israel; but they have a good middle-class living standard here in Britain that they won't move to Israel I wonder?

To compensate for their lack of zeal for Zionism, they write letters in support for it. They are regular armchair Zionists then. Always they put the point of view of Israel. They never criticise their jewish state.

One jew had a letter published in a Sunday paper. He said if Britain went to war with Israel, he would fight for Israel, and all his jewish friends felt the same way. He wrote the letter from Cambridge, I'm assuming he's not a gardener or plumber in that seat of higher learning, but is a lecturer there, with a good salery & lots of status.

I regard this as the cuckoo in the nest syndrome. These aliens lay their eggs in our British nest & they grow up to push us out & make more room for themselves. If they want to support Israel, let them go there & live. Don't let them live here eating our British bread, yet doing down our country.

Look at the case of Frank Ellis, he was a former NCO in 22 SAS, he put his life at risk for this country. Dr. Ellis got a job at Leeds University, when he made some comment that went against the line of the politically correct brigade that infests Britain these days, they raised a howl of rage. It ended with Frank Ellis getting the boot out of his job in Leeds, as the alien cuckoos all united to push him out of the nest.

How long will it be until the British people waken up to see whats being done to them in our land by droves of alien cuckoo birds?

These aliens won't live in their own lands, they vote with their feet in favour of the high-culture of Britain. They show that by living here that they think our culture is better than that in their own lands, this must be true or they would not live here. I mean it can't seriously be argued that they love us British, alougth they eat our British bread.

They get the support of the left, of cource. The left seem to think if they flood Britain with droves of aliens, these people, colonising our nation will vote for the left to get into power. It doesn't matter to a middle-class lefty that his own country is being colonised by droves of hostile anti-British aliens.

The poison of Marxism makes him (or her) hate Britain as ferverntly as the most ardent supporter of Zionism or Al Queda.

Thoughts & Reflections 2

I read in the press that around 140,000 voting slips were seen as "spolied" in the recent council elections in Scotland. This means 140,000 folk did not get their vote! It looks like just another rotten scam by the "democratic process". The SNP got one seat more than Labour. The SNP schedule is nothing less than the break-up of Great Britain. These seperatists want to see Scotland, Wales, Ulster & England as mere regions of the all powerful European Union.
We British need to show National Unity in the face of aggressive European & Irish chauvinism. The Europeans (EU) want to break, divide and so weaken us. The Republican chauvinists in Ireland seek to join Ulster tothem in an anti-British union.
An accquaintance of mine dropped some reading material through my letter box. Amongst the material were copies of "Borderland" whose editor is Larry O'Hara. The paper is mainly filled with criticisms of right-wing organisations. In fact O'Haras' publication like that of Searchlight seems to show that the deadly enemy of the British People are the British People themselves.
O'Hara seems to love the Animal Liberation Front. This is a group of terrorists who have been known to set alight lorries delivering goods to establishments. The ALF are morally unacceptable to me. As a lorry driver myself, I know that lots of truckers sleep in their cabs. Do the ALF care if these men are murdered?
We see hatred expressed for us in newspapers like the Guardian; the Independant; Socialist Worker; Searchlight & a whole host of anti-British media. These organs pour excrement on the heads of British workers. Yasmin Alibhai Brown says we are "lazy slobs" in the Independant. The Daily Express calls us "thuggish nerds" and constantly insults them. One writer in the Daily Mail said he drove through London's East End and saw hardly anyone on the streets. It never entered his head that they might be at work! The media intellectuals know little about the White Working folk of Britain.
A few years ago an American woman found her home had been invaded by verminous insects. She bought a number of fumigation "bombs" and turned them on. These work on the aerosol principle, releasing the fumigant as a sort of spray.
The whole house was filled with this bug-killing gas, it suddenly blew up and wrecked the woman's home. You see, she had a gas pilot-light on and it ignited the inflamible gas.
Now this is interesting because "eye witnesses" to the Holocaust" have said in their sworn testomies that they had seen the Sonderkommando (Special troops) going into the gas chambers (?) in Auschwitz smoking or lighting up cigarettes after the gassing in the chamber. When qualified researchers said such conduct would have caused a massive explosion in the gas chambers they were derided. Strange eh?
Bernie Grant, the black agitator used to associate with the ultra-left Trotskyites. But Bernie had ambition. When he saw the Trots were going no-where he quit associating with them and went to the Labour party. They quickly got him a seat in parlament with a nice fat salery plus the usual expenses.
Alan Clarke, the former Tory MP said they got £140,000 per year wages & expenses. They have had a few pay rises since then (voted in by themselves) and also big rises in expenses. Now you can see why our taxes are so high?
The fat-cats at westminster look after themselves and then, if they can be bothered getting round to it, the people of Britain. And guess who'll be at the back of the queue? I'll let you figure that out!